Virginia Beach Theology and Philosophy Meetup Group

The COVE is located to the rear of FAUMC church parking lot.
The discussion will start with Stoicism in an age of materialism and commercialism.
Some resources you might enjoy include:
Simple Man” by Lynyrd Skynyrd on Amazon Music.
https://music.amazon.com/albums/B000V6AD46?do=play&trackAsin=B000V68LJ0&ts=1754662148&ref=dm_sh_kV8WdIE88imM0WPkyvOx8fXNB
Stoicism Explained in 3 minutes https://youtu.be/Rxzx5x7TY5M?si=ITCoo6X6eNQHvvnl
History of Stoicism & its LOGOS https://youtu.be/R9OCA6UFE-0?si=8f5qF9_WymMrHIXh
The philosophy of Stoicism - Massimo Pigliucci https://youtu.be/R9OCA6UFE-0?si=xHBTvv74rVCgBzvA (Short Version)
The Michael Sugrue on Marcus Aurelius of mankind’s moderation https://youtu.be/Auuk1y4DRgk?si=V6O07d6FXaVwNmRE
Stoicism as a philosophy for an ordinary life | Massimo Pigliucci | TEDxAthens https://youtu.be/Yhn1Fe8cT0Q?si=kdfow4DK6REoaTVM

My Summary of The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius | (22 Stoic Principles) https://youtu.be/Hu0xDtK3g3Q?si=qEm70z6A5Vt5IHzo

Marcus Aurelius' Meditations: The Stoic Ideal Micheal Sugrue https://youtu.be/Auuk1y4DRgk?si=8FY80d23bazWLvPYhttps://youtu.be/Auuk1y4DRgk?si=8FY80d23bazWLvPY

Ever feel like your brain is at war with itself in social situations—one moment craving deep connection, the next terrified of losing status?

We’re diving into a fascinating (and provocative) analysis called "The Social Ledger." It presents a neurobiological model for why modern friendship can feel so... conflicted. (Link)

The core idea is that our brains are running two ancient, competing "bottom-up" programs:

• The Bonding Drive (Oxytocin): Our deep, primal need to belong, trust, and form intimate connections.
• The Status Drive (Dopamine/Serotonin): Our equally primal need to rank, compete, and climb the social ladder.

The paper argues that much of our modern social anxiety, loneliness, and cognitive dissonance is the measurable, physical "social pain" that erupts when these two drives clash—a clash made worse by our culture's "software" of individualism and digital life.

But we're not just victims of our wiring. The paper explores how we can use our brain's "top-down" cognitive control (the dlPFC) and neuroplasticity to "hack" our own hardware, consciously "re-program" our fear responses, and intentionally build a brain that prioritizes connection.

And here's the meta-twist: The document itself is an experiment. It was created by Gemini 2.5 Pro and then "fact-checked" by ChatGPT 5, which critiqued it for being too simplistic. This sparks a fascinating debate, which the author leans into: Has academia become so bent on complete technical accuracy that it effectively abandons making useful knowledge practically available to the general public?

Join us to discuss this model, its implications for our own lives, and the provocative questions it raises about our brains, our culture, and the future of friendship!

Ever feel like your brain is at war with itself in social situations—one moment craving deep connection, the next terrified of losing status?

We’re diving into a fascinating (and provocative) analysis called "The Social Ledger." It presents a neurobiological model for why modern friendship can feel so... conflicted. (Link)

The core idea is that our brains are running two ancient, competing "bottom-up" programs:

• The Bonding Drive (Oxytocin): Our deep, primal need to belong, trust, and form intimate connections.
• The Status Drive (Dopamine/Serotonin): Our equally primal need to rank, compete, and climb the social ladder.

The paper argues that much of our modern social anxiety, loneliness, and cognitive dissonance is the measurable, physical "social pain" that erupts when these two drives clash—a clash made worse by our culture's "software" of individualism and digital life.

But we're not just victims of our wiring. The paper explores how we can use our brain's "top-down" cognitive control (the dlPFC) and neuroplasticity to "hack" our own hardware, consciously "re-program" our fear responses, and intentionally build a brain that prioritizes connection.

And here's the meta-twist: The document itself is an experiment. It was created by Gemini 2.5 Pro and then "fact-checked" by ChatGPT 5, which critiqued it for being too simplistic. This sparks a fascinating debate, which the author leans into: Has academia become so bent on complete technical accuracy that it effectively abandons making useful knowledge practically available to the general public?

Join us to discuss this model, its implications for our own lives, and the provocative questions it raises about our brains, our culture, and the future of friendship!