
What we’re about
Welcome to the Toronto Philosophy Meetup! This is a community (online and in-person) for anyone interested in philosophy, including newcomers to the subject. We host discussions, talks, reading groups, pub nights, debates, and other events on an inclusive range of topics and perspectives in philosophy, drawing from an array of materials (e.g. philosophical writings, for the most part, but also movies, literature, history, science, art, podcasts, poetry, current events, ethnographies, and whatever else seems good.)
Anyone is welcomed to host philosophy-related events here. We also welcome speakers and collaborations with other groups.
Join us at an event soon for friendship, cooperative discourse, and mental exercise!
You can also follow us on Facebook, Twitter or Bluesky and join our new Discord for extended discussion and to stay in touch with other members.
Feel free to propose meetup topics (you can do this on the Message Boards), and please contact us if you would like to be a speaker or host an event.
(NOTE: Most of our events are currently online because of the pandemic.)
"Philosophy is not a theory but an activity."
— from "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus", Wittgenstein
"Discourse cheers us to companionable
reflection. Such reflection neither
parades polemical opinions nor does it
tolerate complaisant agreement. The sail
of thinking keeps trimmed hard to the
wind of the matter."
— from "On the Experience of Thinking", Heidegger
See here for an extensive list of podcasts and resources on the internet about philosophy.
See here for the standards of conduct that our members are expected to abide by. Members should also familiarize themselves with Meetup's Terms of Service Agreement, especially the section on Usage and Content Policies.
See here for a list of other philosophy-related groups to check out in the Toronto area.
Please note that no advertising of external events, products, businesses, or organizations is allowed on this site without permission from the main organizer.
* * * * *
Make a Donation
Since 2016, the Toronto Philosophy Meetup has been holding regular events that are free, open to the public, and help to foster community and a culture of philosophy in Toronto and beyond. To help us continue to do so into the future, please consider supporting us with a donation! Any amount is most welcome.
You can make a donation here.
See here for more information and to meet our donors.
Supporters will be listed on our donors page unless they wish to remain anonymous. We thank them for their generosity!
If you would like to help out or support us in other ways (such as with any skills or expertise you may have), please contact us.
Note: You can also use the donation link to tip individual hosts. Let us know who you want to tip in the notes section. You can also contact hosts directly for ways to tip them.
Upcoming events
608

Goethe: Faust (Live Reading, prep for Kierkegaard's Either/Or)
·OnlineOnlineBefore beginning another reading of Kierkegaard's Either/Or, we'll be reading a few plays together. These plays are all featured in Either/Or, and so they should help prepare us for encountering them, and will also provide a palate cleanser between works of Kierkegaard.
During the meetings, we'll decide on roles and read the plays. We will take breaks to discuss, likely between scenes or acts. Also, we'll have as many meetings as needed to finish the plays.
We'll begin reading from Scene XXIII. here
Video of a production of Faust I: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaogjXLdPow
Here are the plays we'll read together before beginning Either/Or:
- Sophocles - Antigone
- Scribe - The First Love
- Goethe - Faust
Additional works you could look at before we begin Either/Or:
- Goethe - Clavigo
- Mozart/Ponte - Don Giovanni
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQBmLHSXQdg
- Mozart/Schikaneder - The Magic Flute
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om_qtZ-Hm7k
- Mozart/Ponte - The Marriage of Figaro
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55ik-PzAXsQ
On the Friday Meetings:
The Friday meetings began on January 1, 2016, with an initial goal of reading through the first half of Søren Kierkegaard's works. Due to continued interest, we have decided to return to previous works for review, study more background texts, and continue beyond the first half of Kierkegaard's writing.
Works read so far in the series:
- The Concept of Irony, With Continual Reference to Socrates (Kierkegaard)
- Notes of Schelling's Berlin Lectures (Kierkegaard)
- Either/Or (Victor Eremita, et al.)
- Two Upbuilding Discourses (Kierkegaard)
- Fear and Trembling (Johannes de Silentio)
- Repetition (Constantin Constantius)
- Three Upbuilding Discourses (Kierkegaard)
- Four Upbuilding Discourses (Kierkegaard)
- Two Upbuilding Discourses (Kierkegaard)
- Three Upbuilding Discourses (Kierkegaard)
- Philosophical Fragments (Johannes Climacus)
- Johannes Climacus or De Omnibus Dubitandum Est (Johannes Climacus)
- Concept of Anxiety (Vigilius Haufniensis)
- Prefaces (Nicolaus Notabene)
- Writing Sampler (A.B.C.D.E.F. Godthaab)
- Four Upbuilding Discourses (Kierkegaard)
- Three Discourses on Imagined Occasions (Kierkegaard)
- Stages on Life's Way (Hilarious Bookbinder)
- Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments (Johannes Climacus)
- The Sickness Unto Death (Anti-Climacus)
- Works of Love
Works read for background:
- The First Love (Scribe)
- The Berlin Lectures (Schelling)
- Clavigo (Goethe)
- Faust Part I (Goethe)
- Antigone (Sophocles)
- Axioms (Lessing)
- The Little Mermaid (Anderson)
Works read inspired (at least in part) by Kierkegaard
- The Escape from God (Tillich)
- You Are Accepted (Tillich)
Some background on Soren Kierkegaard in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://iep.utm.edu/kierkega/
12 attendees
Foucault Interlude: A Preface to Transgression & The History of Sexuality
·OnlineOnlineWe are taking a break from Bataille's Erotism (1957) to read two major texts from Michel Foucault over the next several weeks**:**
"A Preface to Transgression" (1963), and
The History of Sexuality, Volume 1 (1976)
Reading schedule
Access the weekly reading schedule at this link:
https://sites.google.com/view/existentialism-and-its-critics/
You can find all texts in the Google folder linked at the VERY BOTTOM of this description. The Zoom link is also posted there.
👇 scroll all the way down for the links 👇
ABOUT THIS PROJECT
Foucault regarded Bataille as "one of the most important writers of his century" and was deeply influenced by his approach to thought and the unknown. The first piece above was written as a tribute to Bataille shortly after his death and published in the journal Critique, which Bataille himself started in 1946. It shows us the early Foucault of the archeological method. Though falling in the broadly structuralist tradition, Foucault is here nonetheless preoccupied with themes of death, the void and limit-experiences. As we see, he directly inherits the problematic of transgression that we've encountered so forcefully in Bataille.
By 1976 Foucault is well into his genealogical period. His approach to sexuality is now avowedly historical, focused on the specificity of discursive practices and the power relations that permeate them. This is a post-structuralist Foucault, less interested in sweeping logics such as that of transgression and more intent on the local and the particular.
The sustained focus on sexuality, together with the momentum we’ve gathered through our reading of Bataille, offer us an attractive opportunity to trace this rupture / evolution in Foucault's thought. Once we complete this interlude, we'll return to Part 2 of Bataille's Erotism.
SOME DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- Is the well-known transition from archeology to genealogy evident in Foucault's texts on sexuality that we are reading? Does "A Preface to Transgression" fit neatly in the archeological category, or does it already contain seeds of a future development?
- What is Foucault's attitude towards transgression in The History of Sexuality? Is transgression still foundational to his understanding of sexuality in 1976?
- The death of God is a dominant theme for the early Foucault, as it is for Bataille. Yet post-structuralism is often said to distance itself from the heady obsession with death, lack, void, abyss, negation and the like. Is such a shift observable in Foucault's writings on sexuality?
- We've seen the outlines of a radical Hegelianism in Bataille (inspired by his exchanges with Kojève). Can we discern Foucault's stance towards this Hegelian background? Where does (or would) he stand on the questions of dialectic, Aufhebung, reconciliation and the negative that Bataille has addressed at various points?
ABOUT THE BATAILLE GROUP
This is a comprehensive reading group focusing on the works of French writer Georges Bataille. We are reading key texts from Bataille himself, as well as tracing his relationship with other major thinkers such as Hegel, Nietzsche, André Breton/Surrealism, Blanchot, Lacan, Foucault, Deleuze, Derrida, etc.
Some familiarity with Bataille's mode and style of thought is helpful but not necessary. You're welcome to join the group in medias res at any time. See, however, the group rules below.
Please take the time to read and reflect on the reading prior to each meeting. Everyone is welcome to attend, but speaking priority will be given to people who have read the text.
Topics to be discussed in the future:
- Return to the 2nd part of Erotism
- Bataille's critique of Hegel: the negative and general economy
- Derrida's reading of Bataille in "From Restricted to General Economy"
Past topics included:
- Bataille's Erotism, Part 1 & the logic of transgression
- Bataillean transgression and Deleuzian line of flight: reading Fitzgerald's "The Crack-Up"
- Bataille's aesthetics: the rift with Surrealism
- Susan Sontag on avant-guarde literature
- Bataille's novel Blue of Noon
- Inner Experience and a-theological mysticism
- Bataille's reading of Nietzsche and critique of fascism
MORE ABOUT BATAILLE
Georges Bataille stands out as an eclectic, fascinating and controversial figure in the world of French letters. A contemporary of Sartre and Lacan, he combined ideas from diverse disciplines to create a unique position that he called 'base materialism'. In the early 20s, Bataille abandoned Catholicism, embraced psychoanalysis and Marxism and initiated an unorthodox search for the sacred in late modernity. His obsessive pursuit of ecstatic liminal experiences took him across the boundaries of philosophy, sociology, political economy, mythology, poetry, literature and mystical theology. His works develop a libidinal economy of unconditioned expenditure, offer a critique of fascism and embrace marginal experiences in the style of the French poets. Though he remained largely outside the academic mainstream and worked as a librarian, Bataille is a formative precursor to the post-structuralist philosophers of the '60s -- and may well be more relevant to our time than ever.
In this group we look at a significant cross-section of Bataille's texts. Our aim is to understand his thought on its own terms as well as place him in the context of his predecessors and the French thinkers who followed his lead. In view of Bataille's early relationship with Surrealism, the referenced artworks will spotlight this movement.
GROUP RULES
- Please spend 1-2 hours per week reading and preparing for the discussion.
- Keep your comments concise and relevant to the text.
- Please limit each comment to a maximum of 2-3 minutes. You're welcome to speak as many times as you wish.
- Virtual meeting courtesy: let's not interrupt each other and keep mics muted when not speaking.
- We'll focus the discussion with key passages and discussion questions. Be sure to bring your favorite passages, questions, comments, criticisms, etc.
Join the Facebook group for more resources and discussion:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/755460079505498
If you have attended previous meetings, please fill out a brief survey at this link: https://forms.gle/tEMJ4tw2yVgnTsQD6
All readings can be found in this Google folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VPRdvZYmUKBY3cSxD8xC8sTYtSEKBXDs
Zoom link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81251109319?pwd=R3hVQ2RqcVBvaHJwYnoxMFJ5OXJldz09
Art: À mon seul désir (1979) by Gerard Fromanger16 attendees
What is goodness when nobody's watching?
·OnlineOnlineLearn more about Premise. We offer guided conversations about life's big questions.
🟡 Space is limited, register today! Please register directly with Premise here:
https://www.premiseinstitute.com/event-details/what-is-goodness-when-no-one-is-watching-3 It helps us keep things organized, since participants join from multiple places.
👉 Use the code `torontomeetup` if you are unable to pay and the session will be no cost. All registration fees go directly to expanding Premise to communities nationwide and online.
Date & Time:
Jan 17, 2026, 10:00 AM – 11:30 AM PST/1:00PM-2:30PM EST
Zoom link shared after registration
Texts:
We will email you the readings when you register.
- Peter Singer, “The Solution to World Poverty”
- Flannery O’Connor, “The Life You Save May Be Your Own”
⏱️ Preparation: Less than 1.5 hours (reading takes < 1.5 hours)
Session Description:
What is goodness when no one is watching?
We live in an age of public virtue—every donation documented, every good deed posted, every moral stance proclaimed. But what happens to our ethics in true privacy? When stripped of audience, recognition, and even the possibility of discovery, what remains of our goodness?
In this session, we’ll explore authentic morality and the performance of virtue through two texts that clash in illuminating ways.
Singer’s utilitarian argument demands we save drowning children and dying strangers alike, regardless of who’s watching. But does his moral mathematics hold up in true privacy?
O’Connor’s short story follows a drifter who performs elaborate kindnesses while harboring cruel intentions, revealing how goodness can become theater when someone—anyone—is watching.
Together, these readings create powerful friction: Singer’s confidence in rational moral duty meets O’Connor’s devastating portrait of human self-deception. They raise a central question: Is private virtue a philosophical ideal, or a psychological impossibility?
In this session, we will ask
- What makes an action genuinely good: intention, outcome, or something else?
- Do we act differently when no one will ever know what we chose? Why?
- Is morality inherently social, or can it exist without witness?
- When does “being good” become performance rather than virtue?
What is Premise Like?
Join us in a welcoming, guided conversation space that invites people from all walks of life to think in public together with curiosity, openness, and respect. You do not need academic credentials or philosophical background. All you need is a willingness to read thoughtfully and reflect honestly.
We hope you’ll leave the session with sharper questions about virtue and responsibility—and a deeper sense of what goodness looks like when no one is watching.15 attendees
International Relations and Geopolitics Discussion
·OnlineOnlineVenezuela Update and 2025 Year in Review. Will provide update on Venezuela and if time permits, a look back on the top international events of 2025.
Venezuela
- Vibes-based grand strategy and foreign policy
- Regime change for democracy? Or more pliable former government (Max Blumenthal)
- Not about drugs or fentanyl (Daniel Davis), Narco-trafficking elites to run Venezuela (Chris Hedges)
- Good move because free oil - Not so simple or easy,
- Monroe Doctrine 2.0 - Iran, Columbia, Cuba, Greenland (Daniel Davis),
36 attendees
Past events
7252


